Repositorio Dspace

Machine Learning Study of Metabolic Networks vs ChEMBL Data of Antibacterial Compounds

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Diéguez Santana, Karel
dc.contributor.author Casañola Martin, Gerardo M
dc.contributor.author Torres Gutiérrez, Roldán
dc.contributor.author Rasulev, Bakhtiyor
dc.contributor.author R Green, James
dc.contributor.author González-Díaz, Humbert
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-14T15:23:32Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-14T15:23:32Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Diéguez-Santana, K., Casañola-Martin, G. M., Torres, R., Rasulev, B., Green, J. R., & González-Díaz, H. (2022). Machine Learning Study of Metabolic Networks vs ChEMBL Data of Antibacterial Compounds. Molecular pharmaceutics, 19(7), 2151–2163. doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00029 es
dc.identifier.issn https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00029
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.ikiam.edu.ec/jspui/handle/RD_IKIAM/580
dc.description.abstract Antibacterial drugs (AD) change the metabolic status of bacteria, contributing to bacterial death. However, antibiotic resistance and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria increase interest in understanding metabolic network (MN) mutations and the interaction of AD vs MN. In this study, we employed the IFPTML = Information Fusion (IF) + Perturbation Theory (PT) + Machine Learning (ML) algorithm on a huge dataset from the ChEMBL database, which contains >155,000 AD assays vs >40 MNs of multiple bacteria species. We built a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and 17 ML models centered on the linear index and based on atoms to predict antibacterial compounds. The IFPTML-LDA model presented the following results for the training subset: specificity (Sp) = 76% out of 70,000 cases, sensitivity (Sn) = 70%, and Accuracy (Acc) = 73%. The same model also presented the following results for the validation subsets: Sp = 76%, Sn = 70%, and Acc = 73.1%. Among the IFPTML nonlinear models, the k nearest neighbors (KNN) showed the best results with Sn = 99.2%, Sp = 95.5%, Acc = 97.4%, and Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) = 0.998 in training sets. In the validation series, the Random Forest had the best results: Sn = 93.96% and Sp = 87.02% (AUROC = 0.945). The IFPTML linear and nonlinear models regarding the ADs vs MNs have good statistical parameters, and they could contribute toward finding new metabolic mutations in antibiotic resistance and reducing time/costs in antibacterial drug research. es
dc.language.iso en es
dc.relation.ispartofseries PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA-ARTÍCULO CIENTÍFICO;A-IKIAM-000392
dc.subject ChEMBL; antibacterial compounds es
dc.subject Complex networks es
dc.subject Information fusion es
dc.subject Machine learning es
dc.subject Multidrug-resistant es
dc.subject Perturbation theory. es
dc.title Machine Learning Study of Metabolic Networks vs ChEMBL Data of Antibacterial Compounds es
dc.type Article es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta