Repositorio Dspace

New trends in the debate on geographical indications: Evidence from Ecuador

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Sidali, Katia Laura
dc.contributor.author Granja Toledo, Nelson R.
dc.contributor.author Monteros Altamirano, Alvaro
dc.contributor.author Sanchez Fernandez, Mirian
dc.contributor.author Mejía, Maria del Rosario
dc.contributor.author Usina, Wilson
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-11T17:42:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-11T17:42:44Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Sidali, K. L., Granja Toledo, N. R., Monteros Altamirano, A., Sanchez Fernandez, M., del Rosario Mejía, M., & Usina, W. (2016). New trends in the debate on geographical indications: evidence from Ecuador. Economia Agro-Alimentare, (1), 39–52. doi:10.3280/ecag2016-001003 es
dc.identifier.other https://doi.org/10.3280/ECAG2016-001003
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.ikiam.edu.ec/jspui/handle/RD_IKIAM/229
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3280/ECAG2016-001003
dc.description.abstract Geographical Indications (GIs) are names of regions, specific places or, in exceptional cases, countries, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff (EC 51cita0/2006, Art. 2). They have received much attention in recent years not only at the European level, where they stem from, but also at different international forums such as at the World Trade Organization (wto). Being a particular form of intellectual property, these certification schemes have the potential to be applied also to non-agrifood commodities or even services. Furthermore, due to the grave menace of biodiversity loss caused by globalization, GIs could serve as a tool to promote biodiversity if linked to plant varieties or animal species in danger of disappearance. It seems that at European level these issues are gathering momentum. For this reason, the purpose of this paper is to support new interpretations regarding GI legislation. In the remainder of this paper, the authors will present a short description of GIs as they have been discussed at different international forums. Also, the innovative implementation of GIs in Ecuador will be illustrated by means of two examples: the Sombrero of Montecristi and the cacao Nacional Arriba. Based on these examples we trace possible scenarios of GI implementation in a particular type of service economy such as food tourism. In the final part, some conclusions will be presented. es
dc.language.iso en es
dc.publisher Franco Angeli Editore es
dc.relation.ispartofseries PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA-ARTÍCULOS;A-IKIAM-000167
dc.rights Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América *
dc.rights openAccess es_ES
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/byhttps://doi.org/10.3280/ECAG2016-001003-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Geographical Indications es
dc.subject local culture es
dc.subject biodiversity es
dc.subject Ecuador
dc.subject niche products
dc.subject extension
dc.subject GI protection
dc.title New trends in the debate on geographical indications: Evidence from Ecuador es
dc.type Article es


Ficheros en el ítem

El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia:

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta