Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.ikiam.edu.ec/jspui/handle/RD_IKIAM/416
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMeneses Quelal, Orlando-
dc.contributor.authorVelázquez‐Martí, Borja-
dc.contributor.authorGaibor Chávez, Martí Juan-
dc.contributor.authorNiño Ruíz, Zulay-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T16:49:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-11T16:49:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMeneses Quelal, Orlando & Velázquez-Martí, B. & Gaibor, Juan & Niño, Zulay. (2021). Effect of the co‐digestion of agricultural lignocellulosic residues with manure from South American camelids. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 10.1002/bbb.2177.es
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2177-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ikiam.edu.ec/jspui/handle/RD_IKIAM/416-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the effects of the co‐digestion of agricultural residues with manure from camelids from the Andean zone. Different combinations of llama manure (LM) and vicuñas (VM) were made with amaranth (AS), quinoa (QS), and wheat (WS) residues. They were fermented using sewage sludge as inoculum. The co‐digestion was evaluated under mesophilic conditions for 40 days. The ratios of volatile substances of substrate / co‐substrate evaluated were 0:100; 25:75; 50:50, 75:25, and 100:0. Two substrate / inoculum ratios (SIR 1:1 and SIR1:2) were also evaluated. The results indicate that the maximum methane accumulation rate is obtained in SIR 1:1 for a VM‐AS ratio (25:75) with 540 mL/g volatile solid (VS). In general, the results did not increase with the increase in inoculum; rather, the tendency to improve methane yield is associated with an increase in the amount of agricultural residues, mainly AS. Regarding the kinetic modeling, the transfer model is the one that best adjusted the predicted values to those observed with an r2 between 0.991 and 0.999, and an RMSE value between 2.06 and 13.62 mL/g (volatile solid) VS. Finally, all the trials presented synergistic effects in their co‐digestion except the digesters formed by LM‐AS, LM‐QS and LM‐WS of SIR 1:2. These presented antagonistic effects in which the addition of the co‐substrate generated competition with the substrates, reducing methane production. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltdes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherScopuses
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPRODUCCIÓN CINETÍFICA- ARTICULOS CIENTIFICOS;A-IKIAM-000297-
dc.rightsopenAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectco-digestiónes
dc.subjectResiduos agrícolases
dc.subjectEstiércoles
dc.subjectMesófilases
dc.subjectMetanoes
dc.titleEffect of the co‐digestion of agricultural lignocellulosic residues with manure from South American camelidses
dc.typeArticlees
Aparece en las colecciones: ARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICOS

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
A-IKIAM-000297.pdfEffect of the co‐digestion of agricultural lignocellulosic residues with manure from South American camelids3,41 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons